Preprint/12 July 2026
Egress-Bounded Retrieval: A Privacy-Preserving Enterprise Memory Architecture with No External Model in the Retrieval Path
Alessio Biancheri ORCID 0009-0009-9653-7091
ignostiq (Alesserg Technology OÜ), Tallinn, Estonia
Zero
external model calls in the retrieval path
No corpus content leaves the trust boundary during retrieval
Abstract
Enterprise assistants need durable, structured memory of an organisation's documents, people and decisions. Two designs dominate practice, and both are unsatisfactory for confidential corpora. Vector-database retrieval augmented generation (RAG) handles lookup but degrades on questions requiring structure or reasoning across documents. Agentic assistants that read files on demand are more capable, but they transmit corpus content to a third-party model provider on every query, and their cost grows with query volume. This is an unacceptable posture for HR, legal and financial material under GDPR.
We describe CognitiveCore, an enterprise memory layer built around a single architectural invariant we call egress-bounded retrieval: no corpus content leaves the customer's trust boundary during retrieval. Organising, indexing, searching and ranking are performed exclusively by small, local, in-process models. An external large language model is invoked only at a final synthesis step, and sees only the short set of passages already selected for the question. The invariant is enforced by construction, since there is no network call to an external model anywhere in the retrieval path, and it is auditable by network-egress inspection.
The system is standards-native: content is organised on the W3C Organization Ontology, schema.org and ArchiMate, so it maps onto vocabulary that enterprise systems already use rather than an invented metaphor. Retrieval fuses five independent strategies (structured lookup, multilingual full-text, dense semantic, graph traversal over people-to-artifact links, and a thematic summary layer), merges and de-duplicates the candidates, re-ranks them with a local cross-encoder, and filters by trust and role-based access before synthesis. Text, vectors and the relationship graph share a single PostgreSQL instance.
We report preliminary results from a working multi-tenant prototype running on a real 511-document corpus. Search latency stays under 10 ms (p50) at 10,000 artifacts with lexical and dense layers fused; pgvector HNSW is 430x faster than a JSONB fallback at that scale. A conservative structure-preserving compression strategy (SEETR) achieves 12.8% token reduction while retaining 99.8% of tagged facts, whereas a key-sentence baseline achieves higher compression (39.6%) at the cost of destroying 37.8% of facts, a trade-off we argue is unacceptable in enterprise settings.
We are explicit about what we have not established. Our retrieval-quality benchmark substitutes hash-based embeddings for a real encoder and therefore does not evaluate the semantic layer; a head-to-head comparison against an agentic baseline is specified but confounded by corpus asymmetry and remains incomplete. We state these openly and set out the resulting research agenda: retrieval quality under the egress constraint, a defensible evaluation methodology for enterprise memory, privacy-preserving passage context, principled trust decay, and entity resolution. We are seeking academic collaboration on precisely these questions.
Keywords
- retrieval-augmented generation
- enterprise search
- privacy-preserving retrieval
- data residency
- hybrid retrieval
- cross-encoder re-ranking
- knowledge graphs
- GDPR
How to cite
Biancheri, A. (2026). Egress-Bounded Retrieval: A Privacy-Preserving Enterprise Memory Architecture with No External Model in the Retrieval Path. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21322415
BibTeX
@misc{biancheri2026-egress-bounded-retrieval,
author = {Biancheri, Alessio},
title = {Egress-Bounded Retrieval: A Privacy-Preserving Enterprise Memory Architecture with No External Model in the Retrieval Path},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Zenodo},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21322415},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21322415},
note = {Preprint}
}Published open access under CC BY 4.0. This is a preprint. It has not been peer reviewed, and it states its own limitations in its final section.
Also published
Gratification Drift: A Benchmark for How Much a Conversational Model Tells the User What the User Wants to Hear
18 September 2026/DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22842797
When No One Hears the Recording: Typed Versus Spoken Input in App-Processed 360-Degree Feedback
8 August 2026/DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21849899
When the Model Writes the Questionnaire: An Item-Level Defect Taxonomy for LLM-Generated 360-Degree Feedback Instruments
12 July 2026/DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21323410